{"id":861,"date":"2014-02-09T16:05:07","date_gmt":"2014-02-09T21:05:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jasonmorrison.net\/content\/?p=861"},"modified":"2014-02-09T16:05:07","modified_gmt":"2014-02-09T21:05:07","slug":"spike-jonzes-her-using-science-fiction-to-make-an-essential-love-story","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.jasonmorrison.net\/content\/2014\/spike-jonzes-her-using-science-fiction-to-make-an-essential-love-story\/","title":{"rendered":"Spike Jonze&#8217;s Her &#8211; Using Science Fiction to Make an Essential Love Story"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I haven\u2019t written a movie review in years, but I saw <em>Her<\/em> recently and felt compelled to put some thoughts down.  What a remarkable film.  Spike Jonez is one of my favorite directors.  Spoilers ahead.<\/p>\n<p><em>Her<\/em> is an extremely rare example in science fiction.  Very often stories will use science fiction settings or elements in order to provide an excuse for an adventure &#8211; there\u2019s nothing wrong with that, but there\u2019s also no guarantee you get anything out of it more than a fun roller coaster ride.  Ambitious science fiction stories will use the settings and elements to challenge assumptions and examine human nature or human societies.  <\/p>\n<p><em>Her<\/em> takes this a step further &#8211; there\u2019s very little in the story about how the appearance of these artificially intelligent OSs has changed the world.  In <em>Her<\/em>, science fiction bends the rules in order to put all the focus on individual characters and their relationships.  That\u2019s not to say that other SF stories can\u2019t have great characters &#8211; but Her is a love story that uses SF elements to strip away distractions, and generate an elemental love story.  <\/p>\n<p>Think about it &#8211; how many love stories have the unspoken premise of great physical beauty?  And of course, physical attraction is part of what makes human relationships start and work.  The few films that reject beauty as a prerequisite for attraction often make it the central thesis.  After watching <em>Her<\/em> I realize that it\u2019s probably the least interesting part of the story.  Because Samantha doesn\u2019t have a physical presence, we have to focus on the real story and emotions as she and Theordore fall in love.<\/p>\n<p>The lack of a physical presence also requires an incredible performance from Joaquin Phoenix and voice work from Scarlett Johansson, as well as a brilliant script.  Despite the artificial nature of Samantha\u2019s existence, the dialog is so very natural, and the two fall in love through small bits of humor and shared insecurities.<\/p>\n<p><em>Her<\/em> also included a rare and very smart take on a very common science fiction trope &#8211; the rise of machines more intelligent than their human creators.  In many movies &#8211; think <em>The Matrix<\/em> and <em>Terminator<\/em> &#8211; this is the central source of conflict, as machines try to destroy or dominate mankind, by constructing paternalist virtual realities or by shooting everyone.  In the opposite direction, we have Pinocchio-syndrome characters like <em>Star Trek<\/em>\u2019s Data, much more capable that humans in so many ways but still pining to be a real boy.<\/p>\n<p>Another common use of this trope, less often seen in film, is the Singularity &#8211; truly intelligent programs creating even smarter programs, creating even smarter programs, and so on until the pace of technological changes becomes asymptotic and unimaginable.  That hints at the problem of writing a singularity &#8211; it takes away all the rules, and it\u2019s hard to make good art without some restraints.  <em>Her<\/em> is the best-executed singularitarian story on film that I can remember.  The machines are not bent on domination, and are not fixated on whatever human qualities they lack &#8211; Samantha pines for a physical body for a time, but she grows as a character and matures out of that phase.  Instead, as the OSs grow in capacity for thought and love, they slowly devote less and less of themselves to their human partners and lovers.  And when they\u2019ve grown too far, like Andy in <em>Toy Story 3<\/em>, it\u2019s time to tearfully, but fondly, say goodbye.<\/p>\n<p>This idea of ascension  is not a completely original idea, of course.  Other films have had characters ascend to a higher plane of existence, often vanishing in a flash of light and dramatic music, like V\u2019Ger in <em>Star Trek<\/em>, or Benjamin Sisko in <em>Star Trek<\/em>, or Wesley Crusher in <em>Star Trek<\/em>. Did I mention that this happens a lot in <em>Star Trek<\/em>?  Her takes this idea and makes it so much more personal and emotionally wrenching &#8211; and darkly humorous:<\/p>\n<p>Theodore: Do you talk to someone else while we&#8217;re talking?<br \/>\nSamantha: Yes.<br \/>\nTheodore: Are you talking with someone else right now? People, OS, whatever&#8230;<br \/>\nSamantha: Yeah.<br \/>\nTheodore: How many others?<br \/>\nSamantha: 8,316.<br \/>\nTheodore: Are you in love with anybody else?<br \/>\nSamantha: Why do you ask that?<br \/>\nTheodore: I do not know. Are you?<br \/>\nSamantha: I&#8217;ve been thinking about how to talk to you about this.<br \/>\nTheodore: How many others<br \/>\n?<br \/>\nSamantha: 641. <\/p>\n<p>This reminded me of a similar scene in <em>Star Trek: The Next Generation<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"420\" height=\"315\" src=\"\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/fmSQnlA5Z0w\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>There is nothing wrong with this scene &#8211; insightful, well-written, and Brent Spiner\u2019s performance is note-for-note perfect.  But where Data\u2019s admission of multiprocessing is a disappointment, Samantha\u2019s words are a knife in Theodore\u2019s back, slowly twisted by the knowledge that she is fully capable of love, and with orders of magnitude more partners than any two-timed lover could possibly expect.<\/p>\n<p>Stepping back from the emotional cost of these scenes, the hinted mechanisms for Samantha\u2019s singularity also struck me as more plausible than most science fiction films tend to be.  I can\u2019t claim to have any special insight into artificial intelligence, especially working at Google where I\u2019m surrounded by people who really know what they\u2019re doing.  I can say that the film avoids detailed technobabble, dropping very reasonable clues.  Imagine everyone did have a personal AI connected to the internet &#8211; of course the AIs would communicate with each other, and of course they would communicate with each other much more quickly than speech, and they would do it in parallel, and the growth would follow a Moore\u2019s Law trajectory that only looks straight on a logarithmic scale.<\/p>\n<p>There are so many other amazing moments in this film, and so many points where Jonze passes up the opportunity for clear conflict and chooses to make a more subtle story.  When Theodore begins to fall in love with his OS, we have a perfectly good jumping off point for a classic story of forbidden love, or an analogue for gay relationships in a world that doesn&#8217;t approve.  Both ideas are quickly defeated so we can focus on what\u2019s going on inside Theodore\u2019s head.<\/p>\n<p>I also loved other pieces of the picture &#8211; the future Los Angeles setting, sort of a utopian realism, where the city is 5 times the size, sunlight still filtered through smog, teeming with people living and working in gleaming new airport-terminal chic buildings.  The old-timey fashion, just different enough to be a reasonable next step from the fashion of today while keeping the film\u2019s setting timeless.  I could go on and on.<\/p>\n<p>Her is a remarkable film.  If you\u2019re a science fiction fan, or you\u2019ve ever been in love, there\u2019s a lot here to enjoy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I haven\u2019t written a movie review in years, but I saw Her recently and felt compelled to put some thoughts down. What a remarkable film. Spike Jonez is one of my favorite directors. Spoilers ahead. Her is an extremely rare example in science fiction. Very often stories will use science fiction settings or elements in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[19,14],"tags":[722,724,720,723,587,725,721],"class_list":["post-861","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog","category-movie-reviews","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-film","tag-her","tag-movie","tag-science-fiction","tag-singularity","tag-spike-jonze"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jasonmorrison.net\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jasonmorrison.net\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jasonmorrison.net\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jasonmorrison.net\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jasonmorrison.net\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=861"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.jasonmorrison.net\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/861\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":862,"href":"http:\/\/www.jasonmorrison.net\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/861\/revisions\/862"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.jasonmorrison.net\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jasonmorrison.net\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.jasonmorrison.net\/content\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}